Iowa Libertarian Candidates 2014

After the Libertarian Party of Iowa had their state convention this weekend, the slate of candidates is now set. Those listed below will be on the November ballot. Names are hotlinked to the candiate’s website where available.

Federal Office:

US Senate-  Dr. 
Doug Butzier
US House District 1- Gary Sicard
US House District 4-  Forest R Johnson III

State Office:


Governor of Iowa-  Dr. Lee Hieb
Lt. Governor of Iowa- Ryan Ketelsen
Iowa Secretary of StateJake Porter   
Iowa State Treasurer-
Keith Laube

Iowa House District 10-  Lynne Gentry
Iowa House District 33-  Josh Herbert
Iowa House District 45-  Dr. Eric Cooper
Iowa House District 57-  David Overby



And let’s not forget our elected Libertarians in Iowa:
Cedar Falls City Council At-Large- Nick Taiber
Mayor of Roland- Roger Fritz-

Words Never Heard

Hoodjer Unveils Iowa Freedom Fund PAC

Steve Hoodjer, creator and editor of Iowa Freedom Report (of which I’ve been a sporadic contributor), today unveiled a new transpartisan political action committee (PAC) devoted to the fight for “less government, not more.” According to Hoodjer, the new Iowa Freedom Fund PAC will “aggregate donations from the broader freedom movement in Iowa and channel those resources to the candidates with the right message and the right campaigns” rather than relying solely on the uncoordinated efforts of various partisan and single-issue freedom groups.

The IFR report states: “To ensure your donations to Iowa Freedom Fund are spent in the best possible way, we have assembled a board of directors from various streams of the movement including Ron Paul Republicans, Libertarians, independents, Gary Johnson supporters, etc. Your editor, Steve Hoodjer will serve as the PAC treasurer and run its operations. Hoodjer is committed to transpartisan activism on behalf of peace and liberty working through both the Libertarian and Republican parties. In addition to local activism, he has held volunteer positions with both Ron Paul and Gary Johnson. The board of directors is comprised of Dr. Eric Cooper of Ames, Todd McGreevey of Davenport, Jimmy Morrison of Muscatine, and Jeff Shipley of Fairfield. Cooper is a Libertarian who was the LP’s 2010 nominee for governor and ran one of the most visible mid-major party races in recent Iowa history. He has also run several times for state legislature and served as a faculty adviser to various libertarian groups at Iowa State University where he is a professor. McGreevey is the publisher of the Quad Cities alternative newspaper the River Cities Reader and active with Iowans for Accountability and the 2010 Jonathan Narcisse for Governor campaign. Morrison is a filmmaker currently producing a documentary explaining the 2008 economic crash from the Austrian perspective. He is the founder of Iowa Patients for Medical Marijuana and formerly served as state director for Gary Johnson’s Presidential campaign. Shipley is a law clerk who formerly ran for city council while a University of Iowa student. He is active and well-connected in Iowa politics and is seeking a seat on the Republican State Central Committee.

“The website for Iowa Freedom Fund will be up shortly at www.IowaFreedomFundPAC.com. In the meantime, please like our facebook page at www.facebook.com/IowaFreedomFund. Until the website is active, donations can still be made by check. Simply mail them to: Iowa Freedom Fund, 301 Lincoln Street, Parkersburg, IA 50665 “

It certainly sounds as if they’ve assembled a good team and a nice cross-section of the freedom movement.  I’m particularly pleased to see Doctor Cooper on the board of directors.  I certainly wish the PAC success.  Check’s in the mail Steve.

Rand Paul Is Right

The Rand Paul campaign had barely swept up the confetti from its victory party for securing the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate candidate when the media began trying to paint him as a racist. The flap arose over comments that Paul made on MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show” last Wednesday. On Friday the New York Times reported: “Asked by Ms. Maddow if a private business had the right to refuse to serve black people, Mr. Paul replied, ‘Yes.'”

That’s not quite how it went down. In this video clip “The Rachel Maddow Show” guest host Chris Hayes explains how the The Times got it wrong.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Despite this misquote, Rand Paul did say that he had problems with some provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. After mentioning that he‘s “not in favor of any discrimination of any form,” and pointing out that he supports 90% of the Civil Rights act, specifically the parts that banned institutional discrimination in the public domain, he asked some libertarian philosophical questions about federal desegregation of privately-owned venues. “Does the owner of the restaurant own his restaurant? Or does the government own his restaurant?” asked Paul. “These are important philosophical debates but not a very practical discussion.”

Important questions indeed. If you don’t want to invite someone into your house because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, weight, shoe size or any other reason, it’s generally agreed that you have no legal obligation to allow that person onto your property. Why do so many people think that the rules suddenly should change if you are trying to make money on the use of your property? Isn’t commercial property still the property of the owner, just as noncommercial property is?

Another interesting question in regard to federally mandated desegregation is the constitutionality of it. Only in the mind of an imaginative Progressive is exchanging food and crumpled bills across a lunch counter a transaction of “interstate commerce.” While the state and local governments might have something to say about who someone serves in their privately-owned business, the federal government isn’t holding many constitutional cards on the issue.

It would be increasingly hard for a business or property owner to discriminate in this day and age, not because of any law, but because of how our culture itself has changed. Racism simply is not tolerated as it once was. That is mostly because of the work our great social reformers (often private religious leaders) who worked to change society’s hearts and minds about race. In most instances, government (at all levels) had to be dragged, kicking and screaming, into modernity after society had mostly evolved into its more tolerant self.

These are “important philosophical debates,” Doctor Paul, but don’t expect anyone in the press or politics to debate them with you. Just expect more “gotcha” politics.

Iowa Big Box Parties Hemorrhaging Voters

KCCI Des Moines reports that voter registration numbers released by the state on Friday show that both branches of the Republicrat Party are losing registered voters.

According to the article on KCCI‘s website: “In the past year, Republicans have lost 10,997 registered voters while Democrats lost 17,235 registered voters. Independents gained 7,527 voters, according to the Iowa Secretary of State’s office. […] The new numbers show 602,768 Republicans, 711,106 Democrats, 774,005 no party or independent, and 1,682 listed as ‘other.'”

Iowans are obviously dissatisfied with both parties and with the whole sullied political process. I can’t say as I blame them.

Eliminate Iowa’s Income Taxes

There seems to be a little more chatter about eliminating Iowa’s state income tax these days. Ed Failor, Jr., President of Iowans for Tax Relief (ITR), for instance, had a guest column in the Cedar Rapids Gazette advocating such.

In the extended version of Failor’s column on ITR’s website, Failor cites a 2008 study by the Mt. Pleasant-based Public Interest Institute. The study found that South Dakota, which has no income taxes, outpaced neighboring Iowa in the growth of total personal income, per capita personal income, population, and non-farm employment from 1967-2007. Failor points out: “We all know people are not flocking to South Dakota for the warm climate. These jobs and former Iowans are leaving the Tall Corn State and moving just across our western border because there is no income tax in the Mount Rushmore State.”

At least two Republican gubernatorial candidates have expressed support for eliminating Iowa’s income tax. “That would be an ultimate goal, absolutely. Other states have done it and they have seen good growth,” said state Senator and gubernatorial candidate Jerry Behn of Boone. I don’t know whether or not Senator Behn actually worked to repeal the income tax while in the legislature.

Businessman, Corridor Recovery president and GOP candidate Christian Fong also supports getting rid of the state income tax. Fong says that his immigrant father put the issue into perspective for him. “He said, ‘You don’t need all that policy talk,'” Fong explained. “He said, ‘High taxes are wrong because they inhibit personal freedom.’ Done. For an immigrant from China who’s bottom line is about the American Dream, taxation is really a freedom issue.”

Whether or not the Republicans actually believe in any of the principles that they espouse while campaigning and whether they will follow through if elected remains to be seen. Either way, it’s good to see that the idea of eliminating income taxes is at least part of the discourse.

Cap & Tax Won’t Save The Earth

Today the U.S. House of Representatives passed the “American Clean Energy and Security Act,” known as a “cap and trade” system. It now goes to the Senate where it’s fate is unclear. Opponents charge that the bill is too costly and will hurt the faltering economy, while doing little to improve the environment. Here is a quick video from the Heritage Foundation dealing with subject.

Mexican Crime Guns NOT From U.S.

Here’s a video report at FOXNews.com detailing the widely repeated myth that 90% of Mexican crime guns come from U.S. sources. (There is a short commercial before the report.) You can read the accompanying article here.

http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf

Funnel Week

During each legislative session of the Iowa General Assembly there are what are as known as “funnel weeks” where, if a bill has not been atleast passed out of committee, it is dead for that year. (They may still resurface latter as amendments to other bills, however.) This does not apply to certain spending bills, tax bills and leadership bills. The week of March 9-13 was the sessions first funnel week.

Of the many Iowa bills discussed on this blog, the following ones, good and bad, are still alive:

Bad Bill- House File 179, “An Act including members of the clergy as mandatory reporters of child abuse, and making penalties applicable.” This bill flies in the face of the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion. It would require State determination of who is and who is not “clergy.” Also (as I pointed out in “How About A Little Separation of Church And State?”) this would discourage people from going and talking to their minister, who is “a small town’s first responder for family crises.”

Bad Bill- Senate File 227, “An Act relating to an agreement among the states to elect the president by national popular vote.” Formerly called SSB 1128, this bill would require all of Iowa’s electoral votes be awarded to whichever presidential candidate wins the most votes nationwide, regardless of how they fared in Iowa. In “Iowa Senate Studies ‘Tyranny of the Majority’” I stated that a candidate therefore could “win” Iowa without having a single person in Iowa vote for them.

Good Bill- House File 74, the “Iowa Taxpayer Transparency Act of 2009.” This bill would require the state to create a “searchable budget database website for the public to access the details of the expenditure of state tax revenues and a searchable tax rate database for the public to access the details of each tax rate for all taxing districts in the state.” [Referenced in “3 Good Bills In Des Moines“]

Good Bill- House File 721, “An Act relating to the carrying of a gun in or on a vehicle on a public highway and making penalties applicable. Called HF 116 when I wrote about it in “3 Good Bills In Des Moines,” this bill would alter the silly Iowa law that considers a loaded magazine to be a loaded weapon even if it isn’t in a weapon. This was a pain in the neck for shooters who had to spend valuable range time loading and unloading their magazines. If they forgot to unload one, they could become criminals on the drive home.

Good Bill- House File 193, “An Act relating to the issuance of permits to carry weapons and providing an effective date.” Although I didn’t actually endorse HF 193 in “‘Shall Issue’ In Iowa?,” I did mention it. In the eyes of libertarian purists, it certainly wasn’t the best of the five bills to reform Iowa’s concealed weapons permit system, but it’s the last man standing, and it is pretty good.

HF 193 would improve the licensing regime in several ways. First, if a sheriff denies a permit he has to give the applicant a written reason why it was denied. Secondly, a denial can be appealed to the Iowa commissioner of public safety (and then to a judge, if needed). Thirdly, it would standardize training requirements statewide. Fourthly, it would grant reciprocity, recognizing weapons permits from other states. Lastly, it would grant immunity to the issuing sheriff or commissioner of public safety for any unlikely harm done by a permit holder.

There are still plenty of other bad bills and probably even a few good ones that made it through the funnel. Since tax and spending bills aren’t affected by funnels, don’t let go of your wallet just yet.