What’s In Iowa’s ‘Stand-Your-Ground’ Law?

226fd-range_shooterOn April 13th, 2017 Governor Branstad signed HF517 into law. Iowa Firearms Coalition, the chief catalyst for getting it passed, called it “the biggest gun bill in Iowa history.” While supporters say it will revitalize Iowans’ Second Amendment rights and increase safety, opponents said that it would take Iowa back to the “Wild West” and was even “evil” and sanctioned “racism.” Wow!

So, what’s actually in this thing? Let’s take a look. (Bear in mind that this piece is written by a layman for laymen. I’m not an attorney and nothing I say should be considered legal advice. I’m way too underpaid for that.) The law is broken down into fourteen separate divisions, each one dealing with a different topic.

Division One is pretty straight forward, it simply gets rid of Iowa’s state ban on “short-barreled” rifles and shotguns. Keep in mind that you still have to comply with federal law on these. This means paying hundreds of dollars to the federales, registering the weapon with them, getting a tax stamp, and a bunch of other stuff I’m never going to do. I’ll just stick with a 16″ or longer barrel. But Iowans who want short-barreled weapons now have legal avenue to get them.

Division Two is titled “CARRYING WEAPONS AND POSSESSION OF WEAPONS” and is a bit more wide-ranging.  Most important here is that it changes Iowa law to recognize that “going armed with intent” to do bad things cannot be inferred just because someone is carrying a concealed weapon. That’s good news for Iowa’s 200,000+ permit to carry (PTC) holders, since lawfully carrying your firearm alone can no longer be used an excuse to charge someone with that class D felony by some politically motivated prosecutor.

Another provision in Division Two allows duly licensed private investigators  and private security officers to carry weapons on school grounds in the performance of their duties. That won’t affect many people.  This division also makes it a serious misdemeanor to carry or possess a dangerous weapon if you’re legally intoxicated, unless you’re on your own property.

One last provision here allows someone who gets busted for not having their PTC with them to have the charge dismissed if they show the court that they did indeed have a valid permit. Previously, forgetting your permit at home was the same as not having one at all.

Division Three seeks to clean up and clarify the PTC application process and training requirements. One change is that applicants will only have to provide proof of training for their INITIAL permit. It’s no longer required for renewals. That proof of training can come from the usual sources: military or police training from any time, or civvy training within the prior twenty-four months.

One thing that had opponents’ undies in a bunch was that this provision specifically says internet training was acceptable.  Regardless of what the law says, I hope everyone gets as much good hands-on training as they can as soon as they’re able to. Not to appease the naysayers, which is a fool’s errand, but because it just makes good sense.

This provision also spells out that if you don’t apply for your renewal of a PTC within 30 days prior to its expiration or 30 after, your next application will be treated as an initial permit, WITH the training requirements and a $50 fee rather than a $25 renewal fee. Division Three also states that PTC’s will now have a uniform appearance statewide and if a PTC applicant is found to have been wrongfully denied a PTC that applicant can be awarded court costs.

Division Four is another straight forward provision. It merely makes Iowa’s completely unnecessary ” permit to acquire pistols or revolvers” good for 5 years, instead of the current 1 year. It will also make sure they are of a uniform appearance statewide. These archaic things were rendered redundant with the introduction of required instant background checks with gun sales, which is why gun rights supporters initially tried to scrap them outright. Oh well, this is still progress on this front.

For some reason Division Five elicited a lot of pants wetting by liberals and the press (but I repeat myself). This provision merely allows parents to instruct their children on how to safely handle handguns. A previous Iowa law said a child had to be at least 14 to even touch a handgun (but were allowed to fire rifles and shotguns at any age of the parents’ discretion).

HF517 states: “A parent or guardian or spouse who is twenty-one years of age or older, of a person under the age of twenty-one may allow the person ,while under direct supervision, to possess a pistol or revolver or the ammunition therefor for any lawful purpose , or while the person receives instruction in the proper use thereof from an instructor twenty-one years of age or older, with the consent of such parent, guardian or spouse.” The law defines “direct supervision” as: “supervision provided by the parent, guardian, or spouse who is twenty-one years of age or older and who maintains a physical presence near the supervised person conducive to hands-on instruction, and who maintains visual and verbal contact at all times with the supervised person.” Clutch my pearls!

I don’t understand how handguns are fundamentally different from rifles or shotguns. If kids are bound to encounter all types of firearms, why not be able to teach them about all types. When this same provision was proposed last year, opponents declared that it would create a “militia of toddlers” in Iowa. When opponents are reduced to arguing against issues with absurd hyperbole they obviously have no clue and no credibility.

Division Six is also pretty simple. It merely states that personally identifiable information on nonprofessional PTC holders kept by the Commissioner of Public Safety and county sheriffs shall be kept confidential. No more releasing the names and addresses of permit holders to the newspapers to be printed for back-fence gossip or as shopping lists for burglars.

Division Seven strengthens Iowa’s existing preemption law, which had previously been rendered almost meaningless by the state’s anti-gun attorney general. The new provision states that if a city or county makes a rule regulating gun ownership that is otherwise legal in the state, the person adversely affected may sue that city or county for damages.

Division Eight allows for PTC holders to carry concealed at the Iowa state capitol buildings and grounds. This is probably not something that most of us will be doing much of, but is probably more of a symbolic gesture since Iowans should be able to exercise basic freedoms there.

Division Nine prohibits the governor or local officials from seizing legal firearms or curtailing normal gun rights during a state of emergency. If an official violates this provision, it allows the aggrieved person to seek return of property, damages and/or injunctive relief.

Division Ten is probably the laws most controversial provision, what is commonly called “stand-your-ground.” While this got the most press it will probably not affect most gun owners (thank God). If you find yourself impacted by the stand-your-ground provisions of this law, you’re already in a world of hurt.

The “justifiable use of reasonable and deadly force” was already covered by existing law and HF517 alters some of the parameters around it, but not as drastically as you might think. If fact the legal definition of “reasonable force” doesn’t change at all. It’s still: “[T]hat force and no more which a reasonable person, in like circumstances, would judge to be necessary to prevent an injury or loss and can include deadly force if it is reasonable to believe that such force is necessary to avoid injury or risk to one’s life or safety or the life or safety of another, or it is reasonable to believe that such force is necessary to resist a like force or threat.”

Since the definition of “reasonable force” hasn’t changed, it stands to reason that what was “unreasonable” before the new law is still “unreasonable.” So people who think that the HF517 gives gun owners carte blanche to act like they’re in a Quentin Tarantino movie have another thing coming.

The new law does add that “a person may be wrong in the estimation of the danger or the force necessary to repel the danger as long as there is a reasonable basis for the belief of the person and the person acts reasonably in the response to that belief.” [Emphasis added.]

It also adds that a “person who is not engaged in illegal activity has no duty to retreat from any place where the person is lawfully present before using force as specified in this chapter.” That sentence is the meat of “stand-your-ground” that, for some reason, gives some people fits.

The law makes a few other tweaks as well, such as providing some criminal and civil immunity for a person is justified in using reasonable force.

I’m no lawyer, but none of this reads like stuff that will allow you to shoot everyone for no reason and certainly doesn’t declare an “open season on black people” (as I heard one critic warn). In fact, this isn’t some strange alien legal concept; only 15 states DON’T have “stand-your-ground” laws. By imposing a legal duty on crime victims to turn their back to their attackers and try to flee, Iowa was among the minority fringe of states. But no longer; welcome to normalcy Iowa!

Division Eleven makes it a class “D” felony to illegally buy a weapon or ammo, knowingly provide false information on your gun purchase paperwork, or get someone else to do it for you. This shouldn’t affect you unless you’re a crook.

Division Twelve removes the previous requirement that a person on a snowmobile or ATV carry their handgun a special retention holster. You can now use any kind of holster.

Division Thirteen was a rather neat little surprise since I didn’t really hear about it until I read the law for myself.  It states that owners or tenants of private property in unincorporated areas (or folks with their permission) may discharge a firearm for target practice on those private premises. Further, “the use of such private premises for target shooting shall not be found to be in violation of a noise ordinance or declared a public or private nuisance or be otherwise prohibited under state or local law.” Ideally this law shouldn’t be necessary since you should be able to do pretty much whatever you want on your own land, but it’s a nice protection since that’s often not how it goes in modern America.

Division Fourteen sets up the effective dates. The section allowing parents to train their kids on handgun safety (Division Five) and the section keeping personal PTC information confidential (Division Six) go into effect immediately. All the rest go into effect July 1st, which is when new Iowa laws usually take effect. Division Fourteen also states that Division Six confidentiality is for nonprofessional PTC holders.

In total, HF517 can certainly be viewed as a huge win for Iowa’s gun owners. But that doesn’t mean that it has to be a loss for any other Iowan (other than maybe the occasional ruffian). So if you are someone who is morosely fretting about the sky falling from Wild West shootouts, racial genocide and toddler militias out your front door: Take heart! Your fellow Iowans are not the irresponsible, despicable, racist, pieces of human debris that you’ve been led to believe they are. Life will go on, just as it did after the “shall issue” permit law was passed, and individual Iowans are a bit freer. That’s a good thing.



2 thoughts on “What’s In Iowa’s ‘Stand-Your-Ground’ Law?”

  1. Mr. Cashner, thank you for offering this detailed examination of HF517. The bill is quite complex, in that it has thirteen divisions that add to or modify specific areas of Iowa law pertaining to firearms, other weapons or self-defense. Several of these divisions have multiple sub-parts, each having a distinct effect on the law.
    As the Chief Lobbyist for Iowa Firearms Coalition (an unpaid position, BTW), I worked with Iowa legislators for months during the drafting and consideration of what became HF517. While your overall description of the bill is quite accurate, I’d like to offer a few small corrections or additions. As you did, I’ll offer them in the order their relevant divisions appear in the bill.
    Division II: An important provision here is that “certified peace officers” will now be allowed to carry weapons on school grounds at all times. Current law permits them to do so only while engaged in their official duties. This provision was originally offered as SF87 by Senator Kinney (D-Johnson Co.), a former Deputy Sheriff, and was added to this bill as an amendment by the Senate. The change was supported by Iowa Firearms Coalition and NRA.
    Division III: You pointed out that after July 1, a person who is charged with failing to present their Permit to Carry to law enforcement upon demand, will be entitled to have the charge dismissed if that person presents to the clerk of district court a valid permit that was valid at the time of the alleged offense. However, it’s important to note that the court will assess “the costs of the action” against the person.
    As you stated, the bill specifically provides that certain internet training meets the requirements for initial issuance of a Permit to Carry Weapons. This eligibility had already been established by the Iowa Department of Public Safety, but this provision codifies their ruling. The training may be “conducted over the internet in a live or web-based format, if completion of the course is verified by the instructor or provider of the course.”
    The bill allows certain hunter safety training to satisfy the training requirement for the issuance of an initial PCW. This was an IFC initiative and looks forward to our goal of seeing firearm and hunter safety once again offered in Iowa schools. After July 1, 2017, this rule will apply: ” Completion of a hunter education program approved by the natural resource commission pursuant to section 483A.27, if the program includes handgun safety training and completion of the handgun safety training is included on the certificate of completion. ”
    Division VI: The privacy of records applies to the personal information on permits and applications for both professional AND non-professional Permits to Carry Weapons AND for Permits to Acquire Pistols and Revolvers. This is applicable to any permit that is valid on or after the enactment of the bill (April 13, 2017).
    Division VII: The attempts by IFC and NRA to strengthen Iowa’s long-existing law preempting regulation of firearms to the state (Iowa Code 724.28) was fought tooth and nail by the community colleges, county attorneys, courts and others. These are powerful lobbies and it was actually difficult to keep from going backward in this area of the bill. We managed to fight off specific exemptions to preemption for community colleges and the like and we were, fortunately, able to add a provision that provides legal “standing” for a person adversely affected by (already illegal) local firearms restrictions to sue. Your explanation of this was accurate, but a little incomplete. Such a person may “for declaratory and injunctive relief for damages.” So the courts would not only settle damages, they could stop the local jurisdiction from maintaining/enforcing the regulation.
    Division VIII: Capitol Carry
    Current Iowa Administrative Code prohibits “members of the public” from carrying weapons “within the buildings of the Capitol Complex”. This includes the parking structure, by the way. Otherwise, carrying on the grounds of the Capitol Complex is currently regulated exactly the same as most everywhere else in the state. Since the Capitol is within city limits, one must have a Permit to Carry Weapons to carry on the grounds (including parking lots, but not the parking structure). With a PCW, a person may carry a handgun, long gun or other legal weapon and may carry it openly or concealed. Legislators, their staff and other employees are NOT “members of the public” and are not restricted by this rule. (Employees may have employment rules that prohibit weapons, but those are not legal restrictions and also do not apply to legislators.)
    IFC and NRA had lobbied to do away with this restriction altogether, although even many of our “friends” in the legislature opposed allowing the public to carry in the Capitol. Our proposal would have allowed those with PCWs to carry anywhere in the Capitol Complex (in other words, in all the office buildings). This issue also became entangled with the issue of state firearms preemption, since local governments sought the ability to ban firearms in city halls, at public meetings, etc. To give credit where credit is due, our friends who opposed this provision DID choke down their objections and vote for it. However, there were several attempts to modify this provision, partly in an effort to deal with the problem of the Supreme Court, which has its own building in the Capitol Complex – with its own security screening – but which also controlled some of the rooms in the Capitol itself. As a result, the Senate amended this provision to:
    1. Prohibit a person, other than a peace officer, from OPENLY carrying a pistol or revolver in the capitol building and on the grounds surrounding the capitol building including state parking lots and parking garages.
    2. Provide that a person who, upon request, displays to capitol security personnel a valid permit to carry weapons MAY NOT be prohibited from the lawful carrying, transportation, or possession of any pistol or revolver in the capitol building and on the grounds surrounding the capitol building including state parking lots and parking garages.
    This statute will become effective on July 1, 2017. The actual new policies and procedures for implementing Capitol security have yet to be developed. Until and unless the current administrative rule is repealed or amended, it will still be illegal to carry in the other buildings of the Capitol Complex.
    Again, sir, thank you for helping educate Iowans about the actual content of HF517.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s