As the issue heats up in Iowa, Iowa City Press-Citizen writer Beth Cody weighs in on her website:
“Conservative Republicans have traditionally upheld personal freedoms and limited government (which is why I am still a registered Republican).
“Insisting that government get out of the marriage business is the only opinion that is consistent with Conservative belief in limited government.
“How could any advocate of Constitutional freedoms believe otherwise? Just as freedom of speech is not limited to speech that the majority finds agreeable, freedom to associate is not limited to majority-approved groups.
“Whether or not one personally approves of homosexual relationships, no rationale exists for government interference in such personal matters.
“As government once prohibited men and women of different races from marrying, now government appointees and bureaucrats believe they are wise enough to decide whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry.
“Why is it that people invariably look to government to help them, when government is nearly always the main force to be overcome in the pursuit of happiness?
“Marriages should be private contracts between individuals of legal age. Government would simply record civil union contracts as they occur, and enforce them like any other contract.
“Whether to call such unions “marriages” would be decided by couples, their families, their churches – not by government.
“Other people and businesses should be free to recognize (or not) these marriages; and churches not required to marry any specific couples.
“No matter how the Iowa legal case is decided, we will have made little progress toward real freedom from our government masters. I believe it will be up to Constitutional Conservative groups to ask the real question: who should control marriages: the state or free individuals?”
Read the entire article here.